COP at the crossroads

Download the report

COP30 marks a turning point: climate diplomacy enters an era of uncomfortable maturity, where scientific urgency collides with political and economic weariness. The framework of the Paris Agreement remains as a regulatory anchor, but the gap between ambition and results is widening. Of the ninety-eight new Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs), only two are consistent with the 1.5 °C target, and the planet is heading toward a warming of between 2.3 and 2.5 °C. The misalignment between commitments, capabilities and credibility calls into question the multilateral system.

Climate policy is fracturing between divergent development models. The US, under an administration hostile to the transition, has reversed incentives for renewables and weakened its international leadership. Europe preserves its regulatory ambition, but suffers from social, political and financial fatigue. China and India prioritize energy security and green industrialization without compromising growth. The result is a multipolar board in which climate ceases to be a ground for consensus and becomes a vector of power and industrial competitiveness.

Scientific diagnosis worsens the equation: the climate acceleration recorded in recent years suggests proximity to tipping points in the global climate system. Every additional tenth of a degree of warming multiplies the risk of irreversible transformations. Designed for a relatively predictable climate, the Paris framework shows limits in governing a planet touching physical thresholds. The task is no longer just to reduce emissions: it is to manage the stability of the Earth system and safeguard the resilience of societies and infrastructure.

The financial deficit is the Achilles' heel of climate governance. The promise of 100 billion dollars annually in support to the Global South never arrives and suffers from a lack of transparency. The investment gap grows every year, while most flows arrive in the form of debt and are oriented toward mitigation rather than adaptation. Climate policy thus risks turning into accounting rhetoric without moral or economic solvency.

The rise of greenwashing and climate litigation reinforces the demand for integrity, but also risks exacerbating the erosion of credibility and climate cynicism. Carbon markets face doubts about the additionality and traceability of credits, and only stricter standards —such as the new Article 6 mechanisms— will be able to restore their credibility. In adaptation, the gap is even wider: the needs of developing countries are ten times higher than available flows, and regions such as the Sahel or the Mediterranean are entering systemic risk zones that combine water, food and social stability.

Classic multilateralism is giving ground to a mosaic of thematic alliances, climate clubs and trade agreements that mix environmental standards and geoeconomic power. In this new grammar of international politics, influence is measured by the capacity to execute, finance and verify. If COP30 manages to anchor three operational minimums —accounting integrity, usable financing and acceptance of adaptation needs— it will have laid the foundations for a more effective and less declarational climate diplomacy.

Download the report